https://rybar.ru/piwigo/upload/2025/12/15/20251215204531-3ea6fffa.jpg
Piyavka
- Post author By Teop Versant
- Post date
- Categories In Innovative, War
Piyavka
PETA -v- People
I wonder how it feels to the people of Mexico City, their daily lives a struggle to find running water. How does it feel when their former mayor who sold the water rights to capitalists, gets the Noble PETA prize for her ethical support for pets. Going so far as to alter the constitution.
Breakdown of the Expropriation Issue
- Original communal use: The Santa Úrsula Coapa community historically relied on the well for local water needs.
- 1962 land seizure: Large swaths of Santa Úrsula Coapa’s communal lands were expropriated by the federal government to build Azteca Stadium. This included displacement of families and loss of community resources.
- Televisa’s takeover: In 2018, the neighboring well was privatized by Televisa, which also owns the stadium. The company now extracts water at depths of 400 meters, compared to the original 80, showing over-exploitation.
- Current concession: Televisa holds the concession rights and has a collaboration agreement with Mexico City to donate water to the public network. However, residents argue this arrangement is precarious, since Televisa can withdraw the donation at any time.
- Community demand: Residents are urging President Claudia Sheinbaum to expropriate the well back from Televisa and return it to public control.
The well containing the water for the community was privatized in 2018 for use by the stadium. In 2018, the mayor (officially Head of Government) of Mexico City was Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, who took office on December 5, 2018, after winning the election earlier that year.
She came to power near the end of 2018. However, considering the problem persists (humans with no rights to drinking water) – it is safe to say she did nothing to solve the problem. Then she gets the nod for president.
In the words of the famous poet Tupac Shakur; “They don’t give a fuck about us”.
Good job looking out for the pets though.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/world-cup-azteca-water-9.7003750
[they keep having world cups at that stadium. right beside the stadium there is no drinking water. Shienbaum should be considered deep state. peta-deep-state]
[the women no different to the men]
[Mexico is profiting using the China model. abuse to citizens – and rampant industrial pollution. no human rights watch in Mexico]
Brown U – New Footage
the state of Israel
I am typically not fond of opinion pieces that contain no actual verifiable information. However, I came across this recent editorial by the card-carrying, PHD holding – Ori Goldberg that holds particular truths which need revealing. We can each decide for ourself, what if any value.
https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2025/12/16/israel-is-imploding
No Word, No Bond
[thank you, daddy]
All the standards have changed in America, and that is not all down to President Trump. However, any agreement he makes, is all for show. President Trump is using tariff negotiations as an agenda item to an unknown agenda. The immediate effect is pain to Americans.
The deal announced while he was showboating with PM Starmer in September has effectively been halted before it even began. In fact the differences that caused the deal to stall, were already known.
How the Deal Was Broken Before It Started
- Announced with fanfare: In September 2025, Trump and Starmer unveiled the deal as a landmark in U.S.–UK cooperation on AI, quantum, nuclear, and biotech.
- Corporate pledges: Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, OpenAI, and CoreWeave committed billions to UK infrastructure.
- Suspension almost immediately: Within weeks, Washington paused the deal, citing Britain’s digital services tax, online safety laws, and food standards.
- Result: The agreement never moved past the announcement stage — investments and tariff reductions were frozen before rollout.
Why This Fits Trump’s “Breaking Deals” Pattern
- Leverage tactic: Analysts note Trump often uses high-profile agreements as bargaining chips, suspending or withdrawing to pressure partners.
- Symbolic rupture: By halting the deal before implementation, Trump demonstrated willingness to walk away even from a headline-grabbing partnership.
- Impact on allies: Britain was left with a showcase announcement but no immediate delivery, reinforcing the perception that Trump’s deals can collapse before they take root.
Broader Context
This isn’t unique — Trump has previously pulled back from trade, climate, and defense agreements after initial commitments. The UK tech deal is notable because it was broken at inception, before any infrastructure or tariff changes materialized.
Basically, Trump and Zelenskyy have the same problem. Any deals they ink carry very little weight. President Trump owns the category “adverse to the United States”. He is doing just enough good to shield the bad. Personally, I do not think President Trump has the same spirit he had in his first term. The anger from losing an election to theft, possibly gave rise to darkness.
If President Trump is not trying to take America down. Whomever is occupying his body, is. We know the spirit is not of God. His business affairs would not be slothful.
President Trump’s entire second term resembles a failed publicity stunt. For which Americans are paying a weighty price with the added detriment of longevity.
[where it looks like Trump is pissing into a strong wind. it is actually Americans pissing into a strong wind]
Here’s a step‑by‑step procedural map of how Section 4 of the 25th Amendment would unfold if a President’s Cabinet tried to remove him:
📜 Step‑by‑Step Process
- Initiation
- The Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet (the “principal officers of the executive departments”) agree the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
- They draft and sign a written declaration stating this.
- Transmission
- That declaration is sent to the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate.
- Upon delivery, the Vice President immediately becomes Acting President.
- President’s Response
- The President can contest by sending his own written declaration saying he is able to discharge his duties.
- If he does, he resumes power unless the Vice President and Cabinet re‑assert their claim within four days.
- Congressional Decision
- If the Vice President and Cabinet re‑assert, Congress must convene within 48 hours (if not already in session).
- Congress then has 21 days to decide the issue.
- Threshold for Removal
- To keep the Vice President as Acting President, two‑thirds of both the House and Senate must vote that the President is unable to discharge his duties.
- If that threshold is not met, the President resumes power.
[oops. did I say that out loud?]
Either way, Americans are committed to remember, as your civic duty – that the United States Constitution is designed to protect you. If the matter could never rise, it would not be in the constitution.
[a trigger should occur when a certain percentage of the party electing him disapproves of his performance. however, party’s are not in the constitution]
The NATO Act
It is real. HR. 6508 is a Bill introduced in the House of Representatives to withdraw the United States from NATO.
The companion Bill in the senate is S.2174. Both versions – House and Senate are called “The NATO ACT” (Not A Trusted Organization).
Long story short. It looks like we are pulling out of NATO.
Josep Burrell Fontelles, the former EU foreign policy chief seems to think Trump’s new strategy is a declaration of political war against Europe. It would seem that his position is not unfounded. However, I do not have anything on Trumps position on the Bill. He and Massie are not friends. It could be that the Houe and Senate tie his hands. This is actually their foreign policy.
Another inconsistency, not mentioned in the news media is that President Trump has not considered confiscating the 5 billion in Russian assets held by the US. And has convinced Japan to not contribute the 25 billion they are holding. Europe’s last message was that the money they are confiscating from Russia will be a loan. Ukraine must pay the money back unless Russia agrees to debt forgiveness.
There is a monumental shift in US foreign policy. I am still waiting for the part where we divest US troops internationally.
Could there be some partnership in the works between Putin and Trump, the US would be powerless to stop it? They shot that load in the first administration. Ideal time to “make-it-so”.
[imagine that. the house and the senate actually doing some work]
Israel, the Message
Israel’s bread and butter is ensuring their name is always on the tip of your lips. The reason she is wearing a keffiyeh (Palestinian symbol) to a Jewish mourning site (Bondi Beach), is because Israel has changed the conversation.
They will use this tragedy to bring the world to its knees, then kill off the remaining Palestinians.
Apparently, there is no free speech in Australia. The only law they could use, in America – is disturbing the peace, which by definition – is unruly.
Israel, Clearly – does not speak for all Jewish people.
There does appear to be a rise in hatred toward Jewish people. The Jews are a proud people who almost never show humility, only to one another. This is a large part of the problem. People will not have compassion, from whom they do not receive compassion – first, typically. Christians believe how they are treated does not matter. What matters is how they treat other people. Jews could use a little Christ, in their life.
To that add genocide, and the disbelief that Israel could be a perpetrator of genocide. It will knock you for six.
[can we all agree that the police are unable to protect you. they are only useful for prosecuting offences, not preventing offences]
Global Shootings – of note
Is it true that both shooting locations, Bondi and Brown U – have recently enacted gun laws.
Yes — both Australia (Bondi Beach, NSW) and Rhode Island (Brown University’s state) have recently enacted or updated gun laws, though in different contexts.
Australia (Bondi Beach, NSW)
- Background: Australia’s strict gun laws date back to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, which led to the National Firearms Agreement banning most semi‑automatic rifles and shotguns, introducing mandatory buybacks, and requiring licensing and background checks.
- Recent Developments:
- NSW Premier Chris Minns has already flagged new reforms in response to the Bondi Beach shooting, saying laws “need to change”.
- Experts note gaps remain: Australia never fully implemented a national gun registry, and gun laws vary by state.
- The number of firearms has quietly risen to over 4 million, about 25% more than in 1996, partly due to inconsistent regulation and emerging 3D‑printed firearms.
- Current Status: While Australia still has some of the strictest laws globally, the Bondi attack has reignited debate about closing loopholes and tightening enforcement.
Rhode Island (Brown University)
- Background: Rhode Island already had some of the toughest gun laws in the U.S., including:
- Background checks and a 7‑day waiting period for all firearm purchases.
- Minimum age 21 for handguns, 18 for rifles/shotguns.
- Mandatory safety course and “blue card” license for handgun ownership.
- Recent Developments:
- In June 2025, Rhode Island passed a law banning the sale of assault‑style rifles (e.g., AR‑15s).
- That ban takes effect on July 1, 2026, though possession of existing rifles remains legal.
- Current Status: The Brown University shooting has intensified calls for faster implementation and stricter enforcement of these laws.
This is not a political conversation, in either case. This is a tragedy. However, laws will not change anything.
Solving the genocide issue might help.
I would like to add that I think it brilliant the Australia’s new laws banning minors from social media, enacted on 10-Dec-2025. Saved young people from further traumatizing themselves with endless viewings.
Freedom of Expression or Defamation
RTE shall soon find out what it will cost them to provide cover for Israel, as in potentially – dollars and cents.
Big Shout to Bob Vylan (the duo) for not showing the fear demonstrated by the American Movie and Music industries which are run by Jews. My image of the American industry is forever tainted ($ only matter). This is a time to represent, you are weak.
Here is an article on their lawsuit against RTE. With excerpts from London.
Bob Vylan started a conversation, while his peers whisper in dark corners. Step into the light, fool.
Fallout from the Glastonbury Performance (aka Damages)
- Police Investigation: Avon and Somerset Police opened a criminal investigation into the chants.
- Cancellations:
- U.S. visas revoked, forcing cancellation of American tour dates.
- Dropped from several festivals and Gogol Bordello’s European tour.
- UK gigs in Manchester and Leeds postponed due to political pressure.
- Political Reaction: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned the chants as “appalling hate speech.”
- Band’s Response: Robinson‑Foster clarified: “We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people.”
Their chants were against the IDF, and Free Palestine. I hope they get 1 billion Euros.
Judicial Hijack Foiled
By the Israeli Supreme court. The clearest example of Trump and Netanyahu’s love for each other is playing from the same handbook. They are using the same bully strategy. Netanyahu has just been rejected by the Supreme Court, in an attempt to reshape Israel’s legal system to suit his needs.
The rule that prohibits the dismissal by Netanyahu, was created in 1997 because of Netanyahu.
“The government also declined to appear for oral arguments, prompting the court to decide the case based solely on the written record”. The arrogance is beyond being able to describe, no adjective will suffice.
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/article-880258