downtroddendream.com

President Trump’s first successful Regime Change was Eva Morales, a man whom I respected. I posted the map above because of Trump’s illegitimate claims.

🧭 What Happened in Bolivia in 2019?

• October 20, 2019: Bolivia held a general election. Incumbent President Evo Morales was declared the winner amid allegations of electoral fraud.
• October–November 2019: Protests erupted across the country. The Organization of American States (OAS) issued a report questioning the integrity of the vote count.
• November 10, 2019: Morales resigned under pressure from the military and police. He fled to Mexico, calling the events a coup.
• November 12, 2019: Jeanine Áñez, a right-wing senator, declared herself interim president without a formal legislative quorum.

🇺🇸 U.S. Role: Political, Not Military

• The U.S. did not deploy troops or conduct any military operations in Bolivia during this period.
• However, the Trump administration quickly recognized Áñez’s interim government, drawing criticism from regional governments and analysts who viewed the transition as undemocratic.
• The U.S. State Department praised the OAS audit and called for new elections, aligning with opposition demands.
• Critics argue that U.S. support for the post-Morales government, combined with historical patterns of intervention in Latin America, amounted to tacit backing of regime change.

🧨 Aftermath and Reversal

• In October 2020, Bolivia held new elections. Luis Arce, Morales’s former finance minister and candidate of the Movement for Socialism (MAS), won in a landslide.
• This was widely seen as a rejection of the Áñez interim government and a restoration of MAS’s democratic mandate.

Summary

While the U.S. did not intervene militarily in Bolivia in 2019, it played a significant political role by endorsing the interim government that replaced Morales. The events are widely debated, with many international observers and scholars labeling it a U.S.-backed coup, though the U.S. government denies direct involvement.

President Trump has puppets in Argentina and Bolivia. He is working on Venezuela but will settle for oil.

I am quite enjoying the show. It is like watching the Book of Revelation in real time. My place in the New Jerusalem has not been secured yet. But I have the wedding invitation. Not worried.

Now that we are doing so well with our rare earth colonization. I have one question. If you could only choose one between drinking water and rare earth minerals, which would you choose?

At least 25 countries—home to one-quarter of the world’s population—face “extremely high” water stress annually, with recent crises reported in parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. These include both lack of access and contaminated supply, often with deadly consequences.

I have already reported on Mexico, where the residents beside the big foosball stadium have no drinking water. The president was mayor. She did not sleep her way to the top, but it’s real close.

Now Indians are dying from tap water. We have solutions. There are water trucks in existence today that capture the humidity to drink. Where are our leaders.

The difference: rare earths make money, water does not. “People, can die – we need to make money”. But they do not actually say this, that would be too callous. They pretend as though the people being damaged do not exist.

Yes, I see Italy is struggling as well. However, she is addressing aging infrastructure – with pace. I only mention Italy because she is a large donor to the document below. So, Italy’s leadership becomes visible for all to see, kudos.

Fortunately, my water comes from The High Plains Aquifer, which also is beginning to struggle.

Different question; which has more value – peace, or water? How we spend our time is crucial. This world will never know peace. And time is a terrible thing to waste.

Are you getting what we need out of your leadership choices? Or are you just a piece in somebody’s political jigsaw puzzle?