It is at the fore that regime change is down to whomever is in charge of the United States, at any given moment.
My understanding of the 1979 revolution is that it was peaceful. The Shah of Iran fled the country. The exiled returned. The Shah became the exiled.
The reason why the Shah was easily toppled is because he was a Trumpster. The rich got richer. The poor get poorer. My guess is that that poor vastly outnumbered the rich at the time of the revolution. But unless an educated person says it cannot be true.
We keep encouraging regime changes as if something magical will happen. Logic dictates that at some point the United States will pay for her aggression, similar to the uselessness of colonialism. Meanwhile the pheasants, the ones doing the heavy lifting – get what?
By what vessel of nobility does the Shah of Iran deserve to reclaim his throne?
[we can see the result of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, through Iran’s example. But the rich will never change. therefore, I predict that the primary commodity of the 22nd century will be personal security. problem: everybody in America has a gun. I doubt the conditions were the same for rural Iran in the 70’s, yet they still got it done. or just put your blinders back on, no worries]
[either which way you put it, Trump protects the rich and punishes the poor – similar to, the shah of iran…. may he remain deposed. thou shall reap as thy sow]