My first thoughts are for the tragedy at the Swiss ski resort bar fire, where I understand dozens died. Godspeed to the survivors, may your loved ones rest in peace.
____________________________________________________________
My second thoughts return to AI. I am a process man. Processes and business models are always running concurrent to my creativity, streaming in my head.
So the solution to the PCIe problem is open-client, a shared foundation. I briefly thought I was receiving something superior in ChatGPT. A deep dive revealed the same flaws as Copilot. They are both good, well designed – to a point.
Because of open-client, they share the same “point”. If they are derived from the same base model, my experience tells me that you cannot separate them at the application level. You know that does not compute.
I already pay for Copilot with my Microsoft membership, which does have rewards. Paying for ChatGPT in this scenario is illogical.
AI is a fairly good invention, because it was released prematurely ($). It is very useful if you respect the boundaries, due diligence is down to you. Remember I told you. Consider AI as your program. You have to code due diligence, which is possible – but it multiplies the I/O’s by a factor of 10. The I/O’s (input-output) are slowed down by the bus rate (under-developed). Six in one-hand, half-dozen in the other. I might be wrong. I just like the way it sounds. The beauty, there again, is that the human is now the bus controlling I/O (hmmm), but only effective in a personal use scenario.
[I have also found that using one continuous conversation causes it to, frazzle. when you change the subject, change the conversation]
____________________________________________________________