[thank you, daddy]
All the standards have changed in America, and that is not all down to President Trump. However, any agreement he makes, is all for show. President Trump is using tariff negotiations as an agenda item to an unknown agenda. The immediate effect is pain to Americans.
The deal announced while he was showboating with PM Starmer in September has effectively been halted before it even began. In fact the differences that caused the deal to stall, were already known.
How the Deal Was Broken Before It Started
- Announced with fanfare: In September 2025, Trump and Starmer unveiled the deal as a landmark in U.S.–UK cooperation on AI, quantum, nuclear, and biotech.
- Corporate pledges: Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, OpenAI, and CoreWeave committed billions to UK infrastructure.
- Suspension almost immediately: Within weeks, Washington paused the deal, citing Britain’s digital services tax, online safety laws, and food standards.
- Result: The agreement never moved past the announcement stage — investments and tariff reductions were frozen before rollout.
Why This Fits Trump’s “Breaking Deals” Pattern
- Leverage tactic: Analysts note Trump often uses high-profile agreements as bargaining chips, suspending or withdrawing to pressure partners.
- Symbolic rupture: By halting the deal before implementation, Trump demonstrated willingness to walk away even from a headline-grabbing partnership.
- Impact on allies: Britain was left with a showcase announcement but no immediate delivery, reinforcing the perception that Trump’s deals can collapse before they take root.
Broader Context
This isn’t unique — Trump has previously pulled back from trade, climate, and defense agreements after initial commitments. The UK tech deal is notable because it was broken at inception, before any infrastructure or tariff changes materialized.
Basically, Trump and Zelenskyy have the same problem. Any deals they ink carry very little weight. President Trump owns the category “adverse to the United States”. He is doing just enough good to shield the bad. Personally, I do not think President Trump has the same spirit he had in his first term. The anger from losing an election to theft, possibly gave rise to darkness.
If President Trump is not trying to take America down. Whomever is occupying his body, is. We know the spirit is not of God. His business affairs would not be slothful.
President Trump’s entire second term resembles a failed publicity stunt. For which Americans are paying a weighty price with the added detriment of longevity.
[where it looks like Trump is pissing into a strong wind. it is actually Americans pissing into a strong wind]
Here’s a step‑by‑step procedural map of how Section 4 of the 25th Amendment would unfold if a President’s Cabinet tried to remove him:
📜 Step‑by‑Step Process
- Initiation
- The Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet (the “principal officers of the executive departments”) agree the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
- They draft and sign a written declaration stating this.
- Transmission
- That declaration is sent to the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate.
- Upon delivery, the Vice President immediately becomes Acting President.
- President’s Response
- The President can contest by sending his own written declaration saying he is able to discharge his duties.
- If he does, he resumes power unless the Vice President and Cabinet re‑assert their claim within four days.
- Congressional Decision
- If the Vice President and Cabinet re‑assert, Congress must convene within 48 hours (if not already in session).
- Congress then has 21 days to decide the issue.
- Threshold for Removal
- To keep the Vice President as Acting President, two‑thirds of both the House and Senate must vote that the President is unable to discharge his duties.
- If that threshold is not met, the President resumes power.
[oops. did I say that out loud?]
Either way, Americans are committed to remember, as your civic duty – that the United States Constitution is designed to protect you. If the matter could never rise, it would not be in the constitution.
[a trigger should occur when a certain percentage of the party electing him disapproves of his performance. however, party’s are not in the constitution]